Re:Tether minted most USDT to just 2 firms – Alameda and Cum...
by rfd4sgmk8u on Thursday August 12, 2021 @03:11PM
(#28160241)
I used to believe this -- "too good to be true", then I played with the tech and realized the folk borrowing the money at a higher rate (of course) were earning 2x that via various defi contracts.
Most of the defi world is a scam, however, stablecoin<->stablecoin liquidity pools are handling millions of dollars and paying the liquidity providers handsomely at 0.1%. It is then that you understand who exactly is making big money in this space :-)
I'm not saying there is no risk -- indeed, there is considerable risk and no FDIC insurance; BUT, the game is far more complex than looks on the surface.
Re:Tether minted most USDT to just 2 firms – Alameda and Cum...
by ceejayoz on Thursday August 12, 2021 @04:10PM
(#28160854)
> I used to believe this -- "too good to be true", then I played with the tech and realized the folk borrowing the money at a higher rate (of course) were earning 2x that via various defi contracts.
Bernie Madoff's ponzi scheme survived for decades before it was revealed to be "too good to be true".
If those defi contracts collapse, your savings that got loaned out to them are gone. You're not getting that APR, and you're out the principal too.
Re:Tether minted most USDT to just 2 firms – Alameda and Cum...
by rwiggum on Thursday August 12, 2021 @09:48PM
(#28164343)
That's not how it works. If the defi contracts collapse, the borrowers get margin called. The borrowers must overcollateralize quite a bit, usually 1.5x or 2x what they are borrowing. You could argue that the sell order will fall through in the case of a total market collapse. But the market has fallen 90% in the past and this has not happened.
> This is better than any bank in the universe.
"If it sounds too good to be true..."