Re:Actual impostors don't get impostor syndrome
by saalweachter on Wednesday August 11, 2021 @06:21PM
(#28148588)
Netflix is fairly comparable to Disney in terms of business model and market cap.
Which isn't bad -- I assume Disney also has a number of highly-paid SWEs -- but for me the difference between FAAMG and Netflix is that (as far as I can tell) Netflix doesn't employee a giant pile of SWEs doing blue sky research / doomed projects only tangentially related to the core business.
Re:Actual impostors don't get impostor syndrome
by IggleSniggle on Wednesday August 11, 2021 @08:32PM
(#28150103)
Great comparison, Disney v Netflix. It’s actually remarkable to me how close to Disney that Netflix is, considering the considerable IP that Disney now owns and how otherwise comparable they are.
Re:Actual impostors don't get impostor syndrome
by erikpukinskis on Thursday August 12, 2021 @03:28AM
(#28153147)
I think it’s because Microsoft’s market cap was stagnant for the entirety of Ballmer’s tenure as CEO.
There’s never been any good reason not to include Microsoft except that for a long time it was considered old and stodgy.
Netflix doesn’t make sense in terms of market cap, and it also doesn’t make sense in 2021 when it’s more a media company than a technology company. Don’t get me wrong, they totally nailed it on a ton of tech fronts, and deserve their technical accolades…it just looks strange next to the others.
Oh, thinking about Netflix, I just figured it out. It’s about SWE salaries, and not really related to much else.
…although if that’s it, then Amazon doesn’t really deserve it’s spot any more than Microsoft.