News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook's Randi Zuckerberg: Anonymity Online 'Has To Go ... by makecheck on Wednesday July 27, 2011 @06:36PM (#2814546)
If this statement were directed at particular parts of the Internet where there are known problems, it would make a lot more sense. But as a blanket statement about the entire online world, it's nothing more than exactly what you'd expect a Facebook person to say; they are obviously in a business that benefits from this, but no one else really does.

We have insecure protocols (e.g. E-mail is wide open), and there are places where it would help to be very sure that something came from a particular person. There have been solutions, but none of them is sufficiently widespread. Is Facebook ponying up some money or resources to help solve that? Probably not.

Re:Facebook's Randi Zuckerberg: Anonymity Online 'Has To Go ... by dredmorbius on Wednesday July 27, 2011 @08:39PM (#2814894)
Re:Facebook's Randi Zuckerberg: Anonymity Online 'Has To Go ... by rayditutto on Wednesday July 27, 2011 @11:19PM (#2815233)
the only interests proposing the demise of anonymity are those who would profit from it
Re:Facebook's Randi Zuckerberg: Anonymity Online 'Has To Go ... by mw63214 on Wednesday July 27, 2011 @06:06PM (#2814429)
Hopefully this sheds some light as to why fb is being valued so highly.