News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas by LeonM on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @07:04AM (#28127285)
Yes, we could make a larger cabin with the same weight constraints using modern composite materials.

But even with lighter materials, you would still not be able to accommodate more passengers comfortably. The majority of weight-per-passenger will come from water (which every passenger needs for showering, toilets, food preparation). You would need to land regularly just for passenger hygene reasons. So I still don't expect blimps will be a 'comfortable' alternative to cruise ships.

Random fun fact: The Hindenburg had a grand piano made from aluminium, as a regular piano would have been too heavy.

Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas by hutzlibu on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @08:44AM (#28128110)
I think there is usually lots of water in the sky. You could just pipe in a cloud ...
Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas by TylerE on Wednesday August 11, 2021 @10:17PM (#28150894)
Condensers are going to be heavy, too.
Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas by dr_dshiv on Sunday August 15, 2021 @04:27AM (#28187106)
When you have tons of surface area for free and a big temperature difference, I'm sure water condensation can be done in a different way.
Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas by nickik on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @06:18PM (#28135411)
Random fun fact 2: They even removed that piano because it was to heavy.
Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas by simonebrunozzi on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @04:38PM (#28134118)
> Random fun fact: The Hindenburg had a grand piano made from aluminium, as a regular piano would have been too heavy.

This is truly fascinating. I didn't know that.

Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas by dr_dshiv on Sunday August 15, 2021 @04:32AM (#28187137)
Random fun fact-- the only lady on the first round the world zeppelin trip secretly brought on a phonograph!