Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas
by sfblah on Monday August 09, 2021 @03:51PM
(#28121560)
This is a very interesting point. Is there a counterargument to this?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas
by onethought on Monday August 09, 2021 @06:10PM
(#28122951)
Vacuum optimised rockets require a vacuum. Balloons require atmosphere… so there is a gap where the balloon can’t go higher and the engine isn’t in vacuum yet
Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas
by imtringued on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @10:16AM
(#28129142)
Combine balloons with skyhooks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqwpQarrDwk
Edit:
According to proprietary imtringued numbers the hydrogen for a balloon capable of lifting 1kg to 50km would be $800 if you do not reuse the hydrogen. The skyhook would accept vehicles at an altitude of 100km so no, keep balloons out of the space launch industry.
Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas
by londons_explore on Tuesday August 10, 2021 @01:32AM
(#28125442)
Thin-atmosphere-optimized is a thing, and lets you get most of the benefits.
Rockets use stages partially to solve this problem, also to deal with rocket equation issues.
So already a solved problem
Re:Bring back hydrogen lifting gas
by jasonwatkinspdx on Monday August 09, 2021 @10:06PM
(#28124498)
1. Stages
2. Adaptive rocket nozzles are a thing.