Crystal arrangement results in more power from ferroelectric solar cells

Re:Crystal arrangement results in more power from ferroelect... by dylan604 on Monday August 09, 2021 @10:31AM (#28117330)

I mean, do we really need Jupiter as is? Everything Jupiter has done for us with clearing out the trash from the solar system would have been done by a 2nd smaller sun as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Crystal arrangement results in more power from ferroelect... by RobertoG on Monday August 09, 2021 @10:40AM (#28117466)

Here we are, trying to improve solar cells to avoid global warming, and dissidents like you want to add a sun to the solar system.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Crystal arrangement results in more power from ferroelect... by dylan604 on Monday August 09, 2021 @11:03AM (#28117803)

It's not the solar system's fault that the inhabitants of one of the bodies in the system are bad stewards.

Also, if you have 30% effeciency from the light of one sun, wouldn't the additional light also improve the solar cell since there is now more light to get 30% out of? I mean, more is always better, right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Crystal arrangement results in more power from ferroelect... by stacks_on_stack on Monday August 09, 2021 @11:50AM (#28118394)

I know your comment is in jest, but in point of fact the additional heat from another star would almost certainly reduce the efficiency of the panels.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Crystal arrangement results in more power from ferroelect... by edgyquant on Monday August 09, 2021 @01:30PM (#28119678)

Can you explain why?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Crystal arrangement results in more power from ferroelect... by edgyquant on Monday August 09, 2021 @01:30PM (#28119669)

It'd be twice (>1<2) the energy

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Crystal arrangement results in more power from ferroelect... by skinkestek on Monday August 09, 2021 @10:42AM (#28117513)

And I thought we were supposed to reduce global warming ;-)

[ Parent | on HN ]