Re:I'm reading the FT and WSJ from 100 years ago each week l...
by exporectomy on Monday August 09, 2021 @01:23AM
(#28112992)
That's a bit shocking about the French inheritance law. It must create awful family tensions when there are more than 2 children.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I'm reading the FT and WSJ from 100 years ago each week l...
by valesco on Monday August 09, 2021 @02:07AM
(#28113203)
If I remember correctly the rules for minimum inheritance, it’s actually (n-1)/n of the inheritance has to be dedicated to the children, where ‘n’ is the number of children.
Each child is entitled to 1/n of that.
If I have 5 children, I have to give them 4/5 of the inheritance. Each one will have 1/5 of that 4/5.
And in the case of a sole child, she must receive 100% of 50% of the inheritance, at least.
Re:I'm reading the FT and WSJ from 100 years ago each week l...
by exporectomy on Monday August 09, 2021 @05:10PM
(#28122358)
OK. That makes more sense (except (n-1)/n=0 when n=1). In New Zealand too, you're required to give some inheritance to each of your children. There isn't a formula but lawyers seem to have observed that a minimum of about 10% each is acceptable.