News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:One Bad Apple by zepto on Sunday August 08, 2021 @11:18PM (#28112426)
> make it illegal to offer E2E encryption without this backdoor.

It isn’t a back door to E2E encryption. It can’t even be used to search for a specific image on a person’s device.

It could be used possibly to find a collection of images that are not CSAM but are disliked by the state, assuming Apple is willing to enter into a conspiracy with NCMEC.

Re:One Bad Apple by _jn on Monday August 09, 2021 @07:58AM (#28115644)
It seems that Apple does not need to be a co-conspirator, and that it would be sufficient if someone added ‘malicious’ hashes to the NCMEC database.
Re:One Bad Apple by zepto on Monday August 09, 2021 @09:46AM (#28116747)
Not correct. When enough images to trigger a match are detected apple employees verify the visual derivative to make sure it matches before an alert is generated. They would need to collude.
Re:One Bad Apple by _jn on Wednesday August 11, 2021 @01:33AM (#28138384)
You’re right, I was thinking about a breach of privacy in general instead of actual legal consequences. (Though the possibility of governments backdooring Apple’s servers to access decrypted files stands, that shouldn’t make a difference with this iCloud-Photos-only spyware)