Re:When Patents Attack
by pkulak on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @08:11PM
(#2810079)
That entire article rests on the assumption that software patents have some value outside of the ability to sue someone else with them or to ward of lawsuits by someone else. They want you to think of a software patent like it's a piece of music or a motion picture. They're just like Netflix or Spotify for patents! I don't know how anyone working for that company can sleep at night.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I personally believe that (unless something is done to change the system), generic software patents will ensure the slow grinding halt of entrepreneurial innovation in the U.S.
Intellectual Ventures is the worst thing to happen to small web businesses and developers... ever.
Re:When Patents Attack
by dolphenstein on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @11:44PM
(#2810659)
In movies you can't have a patent for action cop movies with a surprise plot twist. That would be absurd. Just like generic software patents.
Re:When Patents Attack
by noonespecial on Wednesday July 27, 2011 @01:03AM
(#2810841)
Don't look now but...
They've actually been trying for some time now.
Re:When Patents Attack
by dredmorbius on Wednesday July 27, 2011 @02:59AM
(#2811095)
There are business method patents (Google "State Street Bank").
Michael Jackson attempted to patent some of his dance moves.
There's been discussion of patenting specific sports plays.
There are also discussions and stories looking at fields which work well without (or by ignoring) IP protections: comedians, fashion designers, jazz musicians. Even this bunch of hippie freaks doing something they call "free software", but I don't think that will ever amount to anything.
On a very expensive and comfortable bed.
Re:When Patents Attack
by barkingcat on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @11:14PM
(#2810593)
and lots of pillows!