Re:An open letter against Apple's new privacy-invasive clien...
by jasonlfunk on Saturday August 07, 2021 @05:05AM
(#28097086)
Considered, sure. But easily rejected. Let’s be grownups here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An open letter against Apple's new privacy-invasive clien...
by dmitrygr on Saturday August 07, 2021 @05:07AM
(#28097092)
Yes, indeed, let's! Grownups recognize that strip searches are unwarranted in this and most other cases, be they physical OR digital...
And certainly you've heard of software bugs. You do not think that a small one like "accidentally" "forgetting" to check that a photo had been synced cannot happen, and an "accidental" scan of ALL photos couldn't possibly happen in any situation no matter what bug/corruption/etc? Surely you'll share with the class where YOU hire infallible programmers.
An accidental strip search is a strip search nonetheless.
Luckily, this can all be solved by NOT writing such code. Ever.
Re:An open letter against Apple's new privacy-invasive clien...
by jpxw on Saturday August 07, 2021 @05:24AM
(#28097157)
You must surely realise that there’s a fairly large difference between being strip-searched and having a hash computed on one of your photos that you’re uploading to iCloud.
Re:An open letter against Apple's new privacy-invasive clien...
by Nginx487 on Saturday August 07, 2021 @09:48AM
(#28098558)
Don't see any difference. In both cases your private property forcibly accessed without any reason to suspect you, but rather out of preventive reasons.
Re:An open letter against Apple's new privacy-invasive clien...
by dmitrygr on Saturday August 07, 2021 @05:28AM
(#28097170)
You must surely realize that slippery slopes exist. And as soon as adversarial code exists in your device, it will only expand.
Reference: history of literally every dictatorship includes many "reasonable" expansions of power in the name of security/safety/etc...
Re:An open letter against Apple's new privacy-invasive clien...
by jpxw on Saturday August 07, 2021 @05:29AM
(#28097178)
Yes, but I think you’d agree that each slippery slope has a certain degree of probability.
The slippery slope from Apple checking image hashes to hourly strip-searches seems rather unlikely, which makes your analogy unhelpful.