News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy. Parent comment

Re:The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy by robotresearcher on Friday August 06, 2021 @09:40PM (#28094895)
> The only thing Overleaf adds here is a button and a 10x compilation time overhead.

Overleaf removes the need for local install. A full MacTex.pkg install is 4.4GB. I've lived in LaTeX for more than 30 years, and I love the ability to edit docs from any browser.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy by tincholio on Sunday August 08, 2021 @03:28AM (#28104865)
I've used LaTeX for about as long as I've used Emacs, and really, the thought of editing LaTeX from my browser is rather painful. You can still use Overleaf via git, though admittedly the experience isn't as smooth.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy by anthk on Saturday August 07, 2021 @09:55AM (#28098605)
4GB today is not that much. Current OpenBSD and NetBSD install recommend 2-3GB at minimum for a base OS and 10-16GB for a confortable usage (installing a bunch of pkgs/ports, swap partitions, and so on).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy by deroanth on Saturday August 07, 2021 @02:57PM (#28100943)
Maybe it's just me, but 4.4 GB does feel like a not insignificant amount of space for something I don't have to install locally. Or for people that use it rarely.

I'm not a huge fan of Overleaf, mind you, but I agree with those that say it does have its uses. The easy collaboration for people that don't like -- or don't get how -- to use git. I wish everyone I collaborate with liked git...

[ Parent | on HN ]