The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy

Re:The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy by Jtsummers on Friday August 06, 2021 @04:48PM (#28092576)

My experience with that convinced me that many academic Fortran users are cargo cult programmers to the extreme. They're "taught" by examining the code written by their advisor's advisor's advisor who may have properly learned F77 back in 1980, but no one else did.

Even then, FORTRAN 77 is a major change over FORTRAN (1957 and even the later FORTRAN 66). Specifically, that's the version that got structured programming elements added to the language. Having once inherited some pre-F77 code (well, it was F77 by the time I got it, but was started before then and that was obvious by its almost complete lack of structured programming), I can say that F77 is a substantially improved language over the prior versions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy by BeetleB on Friday August 06, 2021 @05:33PM (#28093004)

> Even then, FORTRAN 77 is a major change over FORTRAN (1957 and even the later FORTRAN 66).

That's because FORTRAN is one of the oldest languages, and you'd expect lots of changes as the whole field develops. If you use that as a metric, most languages will appear stagnant. Python hasn't changed much in the last 20 years, for example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Emacs Lock-In Effect or the Emacs Sunk Cost Fallacy by varjag on Saturday August 07, 2021 @06:09AM (#28097375)

Yep, folks often fail to distinguish between old and OLD.

One might think Eclipse IDE is old. But Fortran predates the three-point seatbelts. The Vietnam War. Berlin Crisis. The Space Race.

[ Parent | on HN ]