I think they are purposely trying to make it more difficult to compare.
Portion sizes of 65 gram in a 90 gram container. Then the label shows for 10 gram, portion size, and 100 grams. But not the actual weight of the container!
I mean, what 'portion' consists of 65/90th of a container? They know full well that the actual portion people consume $PRODUCT in is what is in the box.
https://www.fda.gov/food/food-labeling-nutrition/changes-nut...
1gram, 100gram, container size.
That way: you always know the exact amount you're actually buying, + it's easy to calculate if you consume less than the container, either by nx the amount of 1gram or nx100 gram of the product. Nothing else really makes sense, for any reason.
Blueberries, $j/lb
Organic Blueberries, $k/pint
It seems very intentional to me.Same thing sometimes happen when you buy uncooked ham or turkey: they often inject it with a lot of salt water ("up to 8% brine solution") to increase the weight without increasing the actual product.
There's often quite a difference depending on which container size you buy, and it's not always the case that the largest container is the best value.
But would I notice that last week I was getting a 20oz package and this week it is a 19oz package? Not sure. I do remember this happening with candy bars as a kid. The price would be the same, but the bars would get smaller and smaller. Then suddenly the price would go up, the bar would be bigger, and the cycle would repeat.