Why would a jury of peers be a benefit, unless you assume positive bias? It’s an option, you don’t need to be tried by your peers so you would only pick it if it’s better than being judged by a judge. That doesn’t mean it’s a positive bias, you might assume judges have a negative bias.
How does that work with the draft? Look at all the countries that have been invaded, compare them to countries that haven’t been. That’s the benefit of a strong military and the existence of the draft is part of that.
but you no longer benefit from the military and other services abroad?
> It’s an option, you don’t need to be tried by your peers
but you are obligated to jury duty, to the extent you have to pay to leave?
> Look at all the countries that have been invaded
all all the ones that haven't? Doesn't seem like a draft is needed.