Is it really their job to restate something that has been proven for decades? Two entire generation have grown into adulthood with the truth about climate change being known, but for some reason, somehow, you're still calling opposition to fact "politically disfavored" when usually you would call that not factual, or misinformation at the least, and at worst disinformation, or otherwise deliberately misleading information. I'm sure a lot of facts in the world people don't like. That doesn't make it any less misinformation.

I don't know why you think that they need to restate what you should already know, and also seemingly already know because you state that you agree with it.

By not playing that game, to try to justify it further when there is no need, they're showing that it is indeed misinformation.