News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NYC to mandate proof of vaccination for many indoor settings by reader_mode on Thursday August 05, 2021 @12:27AM (#28069871)
>you know--Scientists--without political agendas study this problem very carefully...and do not see any widespread effects from the vaccine after a year.

?? This entire thread is me asking if there's some studies that compare long COVID sideffects with groups based on vaccination. Instead of linking these, since you're already certain (and I would very much be convinced if you can show me) you are saying "believe science" ? And I'm unscientific ?

By all means enlighten me and I'll edit my top post with links to stop spreading misinformation.

Re:NYC to mandate proof of vaccination for many indoor settings by titzer on Thursday August 05, 2021 @12:52AM (#28069998)
gtfy: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/can-vaccinated-pe...

There's even data to suggest that getting vaccinated after already having long COVID can improve symptoms.

https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/vaccines-long-covid

Re:NYC to mandate proof of vaccination for many indoor settings by reader_mode on Thursday August 05, 2021 @01:27AM (#28070193)
So you're just googling post hoc and haven't actually looked into it. How scientific.

This study [1] is what got me interested, they claim gray matter loss compares to control group even in asymptomatic cases but they excluded vaccinated people from what I can tell. I want to see this level of data for the groups I mention and then we have a really good insight. And this data should be possible to get.

Your links are articles referencing self-reports and doctors guesses...

[1] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.11.21258690v...

Re:NYC to mandate proof of vaccination for many indoor settings by titzer on Thursday August 05, 2021 @01:45AM (#28070276)
> So you're just googling post hoc and haven't actually looked into it. How scientific.

Actually, I've seen dozens of articles fly by and they all said pretty much the same thing, because the data is so clear that no one really disputes it. I just googled it because it's stupidly easy to find. Nothing's going to convince you anyway, so there's no point in putting in more effort at this point.