News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why aren't the oldest living people getting any older? by mdonahoe on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @07:57AM (#2806930)
I wouldn't be surprised if nicotine proved to be important for longevity.
Re:Why aren't the oldest living people getting any older? by shawndumas on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @08:38AM (#2807025)
Can you think of anything that might be informing that hunch?
Re:Why aren't the oldest living people getting any older? by scythe on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @10:07AM (#2807364)
Well, nicotine is an anorectic (reduces appetite), and calorie restriction is the most proven life-extension technique known (in rats), so there is the idea that nicotine --> unintentional calorie restriction --> potentially longer lifespan. Nicotine is a lot easier on the body than other anorectics, which sounds like a weird claim but "other anorectics" means nasty things like methamphetamine and fenfluramine; nicotine is a walk in the park by comparison.

The dangers associated with smoking make it an obvious negative, but nicotine itself is not considered carcinogenic.

It remains to be seen if any of those currently experimenting with intentional calorie restriction will achieve similar results to those seen in animal studies; this would be quite impressive if true.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie_restriction#Primates

Re:Why aren't the oldest living people getting any older? by shawndumas on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @12:06PM (#2807961)
Anorectic; yeah, no kidding... I smoked for 13 years and am 6"1' and weighed in at 160 lbs. I stopped at 28 and shot to 205 in less than a year.
Re:Why aren't the oldest living people getting any older? by sixtofour on Tuesday July 26, 2011 @12:49PM (#2808233)
Anecdote of one.