Re:NYC to mandate proof of vaccination for many indoor settings
by colordrops on Wednesday August 04, 2021 @07:24PM
(#28067741)
The flu virus can and has mutated in the past to become extremely deadly (see 1918). Why is it different this time? Why should it be treated differently than the flu, when it comes to variants? I think everyone should get vaccinated, but I want to fill in all logical holes to help this debate.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NYC to mandate proof of vaccination for many indoor settings
by pklausler on Wednesday August 04, 2021 @07:36PM
(#28067826)
This time, we've got effective vaccines.
Re:NYC to mandate proof of vaccination for many indoor settings
by colordrops on Wednesday August 04, 2021 @09:04PM
(#28068490)
I don't follow - are you saying that the flu vaccine shouldn't be mandated because it's not effective, and if there was an effective one, it should be mandated?
Re:NYC to mandate proof of vaccination for many indoor settings
by pklausler on Thursday August 05, 2021 @04:43PM
(#28079497)
I'm saying that we have effective vaccines in 2021 against COVID-19 but we did not have effective vaccines in 1918 against influenza.
Re:NYC to mandate proof of vaccination for many indoor settings
by colordrops on Thursday August 05, 2021 @05:27PM
(#28080117)
You misunderstood what I was saying. I'm not talking about 1918. Covid vaccines are being pushed to tamp down breakthrough variants. There is also as much risk of a deadly breakthrough variant of the flu right now. My point of bringing up 1918 is to show that deadly flu breakthrough variants are possible. Considering that this is still the case in 2021, should we mandate flu vaccines as well, right now? If not, the argument for mandating covid vaccines is inconsistent.