News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Soviet Prisoner's View on What's Important by tablespoon on Wednesday August 04, 2021 @10:31AM (#28061433)
> Wading into divisive, minority issues, seems foolish for a world leader unless the purpose is to sow division.

I'm not so sure. It kinda seems required sometimes if you're going to keep your coalition together. For instance, there are some people who are part of the Democratic Party base, who of all the issues out there, care the most about gender and bathrooms (I know some of them). Their stridency has inflected a good fraction of the rest of the party.

Re:A Soviet Prisoner's View on What's Important by newsclues on Wednesday August 04, 2021 @10:56AM (#28061737)
You don’t pursue a coalition with a tiny vocal minority at the expense of a greater group of people.

Unless you are an empire and want to oppress the majority…

Re:A Soviet Prisoner's View on What's Important by tablespoon on Wednesday August 04, 2021 @11:17AM (#28061995)
> You don’t pursue a coalition with a tiny vocal minority at the expense of a greater group of people.

No? A coalition is A + B + C + ... ~= 50.1%, you might need that vocal minority to make the math work. And those factions won't agree on everything, so there will be intra-coalition tension, but they know they have to work together to get what they each want. However, there are limits, so if the coalition totally abandons C's issues (or even just severely de-prioritizes them), then C will leave.