Re:High court victory for Stonehenge campaigners as tunnel i...
by Reason077 on Monday August 02, 2021 @07:08AM
(#28035153)
> "It's unfortunate that the ancient Britons built Stonehenge pretty much exactly where you'd want a motorway from Exter to London to run."
I remember seeing a documentary once that argued this was no accident. Stonehenge was a site meant to be visited, centrally located and easy to access. The route of the A303, more or less, has likely existed since ancient times, pre-dating Stonehenge.
Re:High court victory for Stonehenge campaigners as tunnel i...
by drawfloat on Monday August 02, 2021 @06:10AM
(#28034817)
The only thing worse than the railways in the South West are the railways everywhere other than the South East.
Re:High court victory for Stonehenge campaigners as tunnel i...
by cameronh90 on Monday August 02, 2021 @05:26AM
(#28034558)
As I don't have a car, the South West is really the only part of Great Britain that I haven't explored.
Really wish we could build some decent rail infrastructure out there...
Re:High court victory for Stonehenge campaigners as tunnel i...
by nicoburns on Monday August 02, 2021 @05:47AM
(#28034665)
To be fair you can actually get to most part of the south west by train, it's just slow. As someone whose parents live in that part of the world I'd definitely appreciate faster trains though.
Re:High court victory for Stonehenge campaigners as tunnel i...
by jen20 on Monday August 02, 2021 @07:23AM
(#28035241)
The train to Bath and Bristol (from London) is sufficiently good to use as a daily commuter if necessary (I’ve done it from Bath in the past even before the 2019 schedule reworking), but going anywhere further south west by train is pretty miserable. It’s particularly sad if you look at the pre-Beeching map and consider what could have been there instead.
What's worse is the state of the railways in the south west.