News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The rise of never-ending job interviews by Rapzid on Sunday August 01, 2021 @10:48PM (#28032390)
Fire fast. Use that 90 day try out period. Contract-to-hire.

In the past I would never have been interested in a contract-to-hire. These days though if the company and role is right, and this an option to short-cut a ridiculous interview process, I might spring for it.

Re:The rise of never-ending job interviews by duped on Monday August 02, 2021 @01:13AM (#28033137)
Just personally I would never accept an offer that was contract for hire and think it's downright insulting a suggestion. My family needs health insurance and the market has never been so cold that I'd be desperate enough to take such a garbage offer.
Re:The rise of never-ending job interviews by Rapzid on Monday August 02, 2021 @02:48AM (#28033601)
Nothing about contracting precludes having health insurance though? For the roles and situations I'm talking about this would all just be factored into the rates.
Re:The rise of never-ending job interviews by tfehring on Monday August 02, 2021 @10:47AM (#28037187)
Even if they can just pay for health insurance out of pocket, they’d be switching plans twice, and each time they’d reset their deductible and possibly need to find a new doctor.

When I was an actuary we used to do “intern to hire” for unemployed recent grads, but I can’t imagine leaving a full time position for a contract-to-hire position. I think for me personally the opportunity would have to be really interesting and the comp upon converting to FTE would need to be at least double my previous comp (meaning the contracted rate would probably be something like 4x my implied hourly).

Re:The rise of never-ending job interviews by duped on Monday August 02, 2021 @10:49AM (#28037210)
I've only ever seen it done in legally dubious ways to skirt paying benefits for 3-6 months for new hires in entry level positions.
Re:The rise of never-ending job interviews by 2001lodyssee on Monday August 02, 2021 @09:06AM (#28035984)
> Fire fast. Use that 90 day try out period. Contract-to-hire.

I've see that work before, but it was some time ago. The company also had a very large test department with separate management and kept to a strongly enforced waterfall-esque design routine.

Of course, it used to be a lot harder to ship out version 1.01 of the software.

I just assume it was a different world as this was in the days of US manufacturing, very limited set of software tools, high importance placed on domain knowledge as opposed to toolset, longer average stays at employer, lower wages for programmers. Probably not applicable to modern times.