That is what you get for airing neutral opinions.

In neutral journalism, all sides are interviewed and given grounds to discuss the matter fairly. You don't for example just interview Arabs when it comes to Israel, you interview all sides. But with Youtube's Covid censorship policy in place, each time a so to speak "Jew" was interviewed, the journalist would receive a strike for it and just be banned after 3 strikes.

That people didn't go out and instantly boycott Youtube for this anti-democratic experiment is ridiculous.

This would be true for [anyone except Sky]. There is absolutely nothing neutral about their reporting.

hahaha Sky News Australia.... neutral.... hahahaha.... good joke mate....

I'm sorry, did you just unironically call a Murdoch media company "neutral" in opinion? The rest of your comment I don't disagree with.

They all do.

This is probably technically true, but not useful. It's the scale of the misinformation in the Murdoch news empire that's concerning.

Of course. We’d only ever censor the news organizations that are really wrong.

WaPo called out NYT for fake news twice yesterday. This supports your argument - they both can't be right! They both can be wrong, of course.