Re:Facebook is now claiming official CDC.gov links are “Fals...
by tekknik on Friday July 30, 2021 @09:22AM
(#28007661)
Are you really attempting to justify censorship to keep porn off of the site? We’ve had algorithms for years now that can detect nudity. It’s a simple filter that can be added that allows the user to select if they want to see it or not. Much like DDG and Google image search.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Facebook is now claiming official CDC.gov links are “Fals...
by nradov on Friday July 30, 2021 @01:46PM
(#28010448)
There's a difference between nudity and porn. Facebook banned the famous "Napalm Girl" photo, and then later un-banned it. Rules appear to be arbitrary and constantly changing.
https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/09/10/49...
Re:Facebook is now claiming official CDC.gov links are “Fals...
by tekknik on Saturday July 31, 2021 @08:58AM
(#28017720)
Yea child nudity is going to be a difficult one for all algorithms as they lack context. The only reason that picture is allowed is because of the context. If it were a random naked child in a field it would and should be banned.
Re:Facebook is now claiming official CDC.gov links are “Fals...
by emodendroket on Friday July 30, 2021 @02:14PM
(#28010696)
The point of this example is to poke holes in what appears to be an ironclad, simple, and consistent principle by pointing out that few advocates for it actually wish for what it implies.