News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Itanic Has Sunk by pantulis on Friday July 30, 2021 @05:53AM (#28006273)
So Rust comes to mind, right? Anything else?
Re:The Itanic Has Sunk by rwmj on Friday July 30, 2021 @06:21AM (#28006434)
FORTRAN or any language with lots of arrays and matrices.
Re:The Itanic Has Sunk by jabl on Friday July 30, 2021 @09:49AM (#28007931)
I suspect if you want a HW architecture for running array operations you'll end up with something like a vector machine (e.g. ARM SVE(2) ) or a GPU rather than a VLIW CPU?
Re:The Itanic Has Sunk by marcosdumay on Friday July 30, 2021 @11:31AM (#28009060)
VLIW is basically a more flexible kind of vector machine.
Re:The Itanic Has Sunk by jabl on Friday July 30, 2021 @01:08PM (#28010053)
And a traditional scalar architecture is more flexible still. The trick is to pick the correct set of tradeoffs for the targeted applications. I claim that for most array style workloads vector/GPU architectures are flexible enough, and offer better perf/watt and perf/chip area.
Re:The Itanic Has Sunk by Semaphor on Friday July 30, 2021 @08:08AM (#28007071)
So, APL?
Re:The Itanic Has Sunk by rwmj on Friday July 30, 2021 @12:53PM (#28009903)
Absolutely yes that would make sense (or more likely the modern "derivatives" like J & K)