News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Against Overuse of the Gini Coefficient by gruez on Thursday July 29, 2021 @11:54PM (#28004252)
>https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/ninabambys...

>It was 1 billion at time of donation but sits at about 400MM now

The source you provided says he donated $1B in various tokens/coins, not in ETH (as bpodgursky originally claimed). This is an important distinction, because a $1B donation in a very thinly traded coin/token is worth significantly less than a $1B donation in a popular cryptocurrency like eth/btc. The same source also says he only has about $1B in ETH, which makes me even more doubtful he actually donated $1B (in value after liquidation, not at market price).

Re:Against Overuse of the Gini Coefficient by dogecoinbase on Friday July 30, 2021 @12:55AM (#28004614)
This is exactly correct. Many people gave him various coins (typically in the hope that he would then promote them) -- he gave those away. I guess it worked, because you now have people saying "He's given away billions in Eth".
Re:Against Overuse of the Gini Coefficient by kingleo23 on Friday July 30, 2021 @08:41AM (#28007308)
He definitely should have checked and publicly acknowledged the market depth and been more cognizant of the local market top before giving away a mere 400mm of his private wealth to charity. He used coins dumped to his public address by scam projects attempting to co-opt his legitimacy to fool naïve investors and in one stroke stopped that practice and donated a 9 figure sum to Covid relief in India and other causes.