News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Killing Robots and Just War Theory by pjc50 on Thursday July 29, 2021 @09:22AM (#27996220)
Realistically, if you win the war, or even if you're a western power that quietly retreats after losing it, there's nobody responsible. And if you lose the war the winner decides who was responsible for your killer robot army. There's Nuremberg precedent for "both".
Re:Killing Robots and Just War Theory by monkeybutton on Thursday July 29, 2021 @11:01AM (#27997342)
If you're the designer on the losing side you might get lucky and the winner will 'look to other way' of your crimes in exchange for your future services. Also a precedent from WW2.
Re:Killing Robots and Just War Theory by stared on Friday July 30, 2021 @06:12AM (#28006377)
Engineers and scientists are generally considered a "resource". The winning power takes them, if needed.

Scientists are generally not considered a threat to power (unlike high-ranked officials). For example, Piotr Kapitsa had his arguments with Lavrentiy Beria and Stalin. Instead of death (delivered for much smaller insubordination) he was gifted a rifle:

"Beria summoned Kapitsa who amazingly refused him: “If you want to speak to me, then come to the Institute.” Beria ate humble pie and took a hunting rifle as a peace offering. But Kapitsa refused to help anymore."