News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Offices to Mandate Vaccines by tablespoon on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @03:58PM (#27988970)
> Same reason why folks who got chicken pox as kids don't need the vaccine; we already had it!

Chicken pox is a different disease. It's not the same as COVID-19.

There are a lot of questions around natural COVID-19 immunity that people who want to rely on it need to answer if they don't want to get vaccinated (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27987103). Then there's the question of why go through so much trouble to avoid something that's easy, cheap, and far more certain.

Re:Google Offices to Mandate Vaccines by lpqiu3699 on Monday August 02, 2021 @01:40AM (#28033254)
At this point I think the proof is already quite clear:

[1] https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-medicine/fulltext/S2666-37...

[2] "The people who are not testing positive in the current outbreak are those who have had COVID-19 previously and recovered. These people account for 9% of Israel’s population but less than 1% of recent infections, according to Kovler’s analysis." source: https://www.deseret.com/platform/amp/coronavirus/2021/7/20/2...

[3] https://newsroom.clevelandclinic.org/2021/06/09/cleveland-cl...

Re:Google Offices to Mandate Vaccines by TigeriusKirk on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @04:04PM (#27989031)
The burden of proof is not on the people who have every reason to believe they have natural immunity.

It's entirely on people who want to mandate a medical procedure.

Re:Google Offices to Mandate Vaccines by tablespoon on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @06:45PM (#27990725)
> The burden of proof is not on the people who have every reason to believe they have natural immunity.

> It's entirely on people who want to mandate a medical procedure.

Nope, not really. While there is quite a high burden of proof on the people who want to mandate a medical procedure, the people who make their own medical claims (such as natural immunity provides equivalent or adequate protection) bear a significant burden of proof as well. Relieving them of that burden is completely impractical, since it would privilege all kinds of spurious claims.

The vaccines have proven to be safe and effective. If you want another preventative treatment to be considered equivalent, prove it.

Re:Google Offices to Mandate Vaccines by TigeriusKirk on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @07:08PM (#27990915)
Making a claim that matches centuries of experience carries virtually no burden of proof. It's not remotely a "spurious" claim.
Re:Google Offices to Mandate Vaccines by tablespoon on Wednesday July 28, 2021 @11:45PM (#27992573)
> Making a claim that matches centuries of experience carries virtually no burden of proof. It's not remotely a "spurious" claim.

Huh? There are centuries of experience that natural COVID-19 immunity is as consistently effective as one of the current crop of US-approved vaccines?