https://electrek.co/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/04/hybri...
The primary advantage is faster refueling. The price is no in-home refueling -- a big win for BEVs, as most trips will not require refueling on the road. There are also real safety concerns about storing and transporting H2 at very high pressure.
Complete nonsense. Most Hydrogen is produced with natural gas. And the conversion makes and end to end efficiency makes it actually far worse both economically and environmentally.
Maybe in some imaginary future that will not actually happen it is as green.
> refuels 10x faster than any battery based car
Waste overestimation and in reality even if that was true, you are gone spend 100x more times refueling then in an EV. Because EV you simply charge at home and 99% you not gone use any fuel-station.
And Hydrogen charging station still have many problems if you actually attempted to have a high volume of cars using them.
> They chose wrong maybe, but they chose, and chose a path they though most viable.
The path that would give them the most government subsidies and allow them to delay EVs as long as possible.
> To claim they aren't in the game is beyond unfair.
Go look at how many actually FCV have been sold.
https://www.hyundai.news/eu/articles/press-releases/hyundai-...
The tech works, refuels 10x faster than any battery based car, but so far no adoption outside of europe and asian countries.
That's a phenomenal achievement. They chose wrong maybe, but they chose, and chose a path they though most viable.
To claim they aren't in the game is beyond unfair.