News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Form Energy reveals the chemistry of its long-duration ba... by azernik on Saturday July 24, 2021 @11:10PM (#27946385)
100 hours = (kWh/kg) / (kW/kg) - ie capacity divided by the most cost-effective discharge rate.
Re:Form Energy reveals the chemistry of its long-duration ba... by ComputerGuru on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @09:16PM (#27979398)
I agree but that’s a highly misleading number because there’s a conflation of scenarios. Capacity is one thing, useable capacity at the requested discharge rate is another. You can’t pick and choose which numbers to use.
Re:Form Energy reveals the chemistry of its long-duration ba... by azernik on Tuesday July 27, 2021 @11:09PM (#27979880)
The combination of duration class and capacity is useful, though. 1MWh of 10-hour storage gives you a very clear idea of usable energy.
Re:Form Energy reveals the chemistry of its long-duration ba... by amelius on Sunday July 25, 2021 @08:05AM (#27948552)
What if the discharge rate versus cost plot is mostly flat?
Re:Form Energy reveals the chemistry of its long-duration ba... by azernik on Sunday July 25, 2021 @08:48AM (#27948779)
Then typically you'll run it at a higher discharge rate, and has something cheaper with a higher capacity/discharge ratio.