News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by notRobot on Saturday July 24, 2021 @07:21PM (#27945226)
Similar: Policy Plus: Group Policy Editor, but better! https://github.com/Fleex255/PolicyPlus
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by montecarl on Saturday July 24, 2021 @08:02PM (#27945455)
When clicking that link in Chrome I get a "The site ahead contains harmful programs" warning page with a bright red background.

"Attackers on github.com might attempt to trick you into installing programs that harm your browsing experience (for example, by changing your homepage or showing extra ads on sites you visit)."

How strange... I don't get it for other github pages.

Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by userbinator on Saturday July 24, 2021 @08:32PM (#27945582)
From that page:

N.B. A few antivirus programs incorrectly flag Policy Plus as malware. Policy Plus is a powerful tool and so may cause problems if used recklessly, but it is not malicious.

No so much different than "hacking tools" or similar being detected as "malware". In other words, just another example of the paranoia typical of the authoritarianism that is so common in the software industry today.

Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by ASalazarMX on Sunday July 25, 2021 @12:55PM (#27950759)
> In other words, just another example of the paranoia typical of the authoritarianism that is so common in the software industry today

I don't think it's authoritarian, just that the more positives your antivirus detects that others don't, the better you can sell it. Something like Process Hacker should have never been detected as malware, as it can't harm others, but it ups those numbers.

Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by zinekeller on Sunday July 25, 2021 @02:13AM (#27947133)
Same here. Surprisingly, Microsoft* just allowed it, no problem. Edit: Also, Google doesn't trigger on https://github.com/Fleex255/PolicyPlus/ (note the trailing slash) but reacts to https://github.com/Fleex255/PolicyPlus (no trailing slash). Weird.

VirusTotal summary page says that it is detected by five different engines: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/dca4ecd769253d3b4a165a5b...

* Both Edge SmartScreen and Defender.

Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by throwawaysea on Saturday July 24, 2021 @11:18PM (#27946419)
I get the same on Firefox as well, and this is the first time I've seen such a warning ever. I definitely don't get it for other github projects.
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by franga2000 on Sunday July 25, 2021 @08:12AM (#27948595)
The same happens sometimes when trying to download netcat and almost always when downloading any of the SysInternals password recovery tools. Cybercriminals use these tools in attacks and so they must be malicious! You know, like bank robbers use hammers and cars...
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by iudqnolq on Sunday July 25, 2021 @02:07AM (#27947109)
If chrome uses something like the public safe browsing blAPI malware checking is done with hashes of full urls
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by dataflow on Saturday July 24, 2021 @11:04PM (#27946358)
Is this the first app of its kind in the world? I literally don't know of a single other app that can edit group policy besides gpedit.
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by bloqs on Sunday July 25, 2021 @12:55AM (#27946834)
I guess you could be right. As a relatively new admin i find it so odd how software that improves administration for windows isnt more common
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by franga2000 on Sunday July 25, 2021 @08:27AM (#27948661)
I'm always amazed by just how much community tooling is developed for Windows. From PowerToys to SysInternals, those two package managers, TerraCopy, etc. All things that improve on what Windows ships with because Microsoft refuses to put any effort into doing it themselves and it's not open source so you can't exactly open a pull request and do it for them.

I guess that kind of approach quickly hits an API ceiling when it comes to administration tools. A lot of them need pretty low-level access to things that MS doesn't provide good APIs for and few people want to develop a product on top of entirely unsupported reverse-engineered APIs.

Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by judge2020 on Sunday July 25, 2021 @01:48AM (#27947005)
The two problems I see are that the program could have bugs that the original gpedit doesn’t, and how most enterprises wouldn’t dare trust third-party software to manage group policy on their internal network.
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by userbinator on Sunday July 25, 2021 @02:43AM (#27947265)
As far as I know, all gpedit does is act as a special-purpose registry editor anyway.
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by dataflow on Sunday July 25, 2021 @02:45AM (#27947277)
Not quite. It modifies more than just the registry.
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by tinus_hn on Sunday July 25, 2021 @04:56AM (#27947775)
No, there’s steps in between to make it combine with the domain policy.
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by atatatat on Saturday July 24, 2021 @11:24PM (#27946439)
Windows hasn't historically been considered abandonware.
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by dataflow on Saturday July 24, 2021 @11:29PM (#27946455)
Huh? Who said anything about abandonware?
Re:Registry Explorer: Replacement for the Windows Built-In R... by xaduha on Saturday July 24, 2021 @09:25PM (#27945859)
I was about to post it too, fiddling with registry directly where things are scattered all over the place should be last resort when there are better tools out there.