Re:If Richard Feynman applied for a job at Microsoft (2002)
by Maanum on Friday July 23, 2021 @10:50PM
(#27938015)
This is really good insight and reminds me of similar industry norms that often get strong pushback (e.g. OKRs). Often there is solid reasoning behind why and when you'd want to employ these practices. However, enough organizations implement them just because they've seen them used or because there's hype around them. Eventually the poor implementation attracts pushback, but often the naysayers also don't understand the reasoning behind the practice.
I personally didn't understand what these types of questions would accomplish, but your explanation makes sense and it seems like this would be a good tool in the hiring toolkit.
Re:If Richard Feynman applied for a job at Microsoft (2002)
by alfiedotwtf on Friday July 23, 2021 @07:16PM
(#27936745)
> I have no idea why anyone asks brainteasers in an interview.
I'll go one further - interviewers doing Myers Briggs Personality Tests.
That said, I agree 100% with you about "trick" questions. It seems some people cannot distinguish between "market sizing" (Fermi problems) where you need to make reasonable assumptions and describe a model of something, and "a man is found in scuba gear in the middle of the forest" brainteasers for kids. I have no idea why anyone asks brainteasers in an interview.