Re:We’d rather have the iceberg than the ship
by Qwertious on Friday July 23, 2021 @02:10PM
(#27933842)
Check out Amsterdam. You don't need to ban cars, you just need to make bikes a preferable alternative. And as has been mentioned all over this thread, check out the YouTube channel called Not Just Bikes, for a ton of good videos on the subject.
Re:We’d rather have the iceberg than the ship
by rhino369 on Friday July 23, 2021 @04:39PM
(#27935358)
Amsterdam is my point. If it were founded in 1906 instead of 1306 it would look more Los Angles.
It's very hard take an area developed around a car (everywhere in America since 1920s) and make it bike preferable.
You basically need for the area to be so run down that you can start from scratch. Like a taking a formerly industrial area and then only zoning it for mixed use, high density residential/commercial use.
Re:We’d rather have the iceberg than the ship
by throwaway210222 on Friday July 23, 2021 @02:18PM
(#27933940)
> You don't need to ban cars, you just need to make bikes a preferable alternative.
You also need flat ground. Soccer-moms do not do hills.
Re:We’d rather have the iceberg than the ship
by Steltek on Friday July 23, 2021 @01:49PM
(#27933598)
From scratch? What starting point are you looking for? I don't think enough time has passed for a classical organic urban core to have developed from nothing. I guess for walkable postwar communities, I would look at college towns.
The cities with dense middle class inner city neighborhoods mostly developed without cars.
You'd have to ban cars to achieve it.