Re:We’d rather have the iceberg than the ship
by Causality1 on Friday July 23, 2021 @12:20PM
(#27932442)
Because nobody wants to live there. Americans by and large come in two types: the urbanists who want to live in a big city, and everyone else who wants a cottage in the woods that's file miles from a McDonald's. Sanphillippo wants a return to this 1940s idea of dense small towns, walkable towns with a population of ten thousand. He doesn't get that those towns weren't that way because everyone liked it; they were like that because they had to be. People were too poor to have a personal vehicle. Everybody either farmed and only came into town when they had to, or worked in the same factory, or worked in a store where the factory workers spent their money. Then when the industry changed the factory closed and the town died almost overnight.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:We’d rather have the iceberg than the ship
by rufus_foreman on Friday July 23, 2021 @06:51PM
(#27936525)
>> Americans by and large come in two types: the urbanists who want to live in a big city, and everyone else who wants a cottage in the woods that's file miles from a McDonald's
The majority of Americans live in an area they describe as suburban.
Re:We’d rather have the iceberg than the ship
by hycaria on Friday July 23, 2021 @03:52PM
(#27934882)
I don’t want to live dependent of a car
Re:We’d rather have the iceberg than the ship
by Causality1 on Friday July 23, 2021 @04:14PM
(#27935087)
Then don't. Live somewhere with good public transportation. Just don't think that you're ever going to live in a small town and be completely satisfied with not having one. Most people who don't want to live in a concrete jungle simply don't like having everything crammed together like that. I certainly don't.