Re:Chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous (2015)
by psychedelican on Friday July 23, 2021 @11:02AM
(#27931455)
The point is that a virus is a brute-force mechanism. This introduces a probability (even a low one) that a virus might "choose" to become more nasty in order to elicit a response from a "vaccinated" population.
Vaccinated is in quotes because many of the current vaccines are, admittedly, therapeutics rather than vaccines. The classical definition of a vaccine is something that prevents infection entirely. The current politicized definition of vaccine is something that decreases mortality / symptoms for a specific disease.
We know that these vaccines are "leaky", and now it's just up to random chance to determine whether or not this will lead to a scenario like the chickens. I believe the chance is very low, but it's there.
Re:Chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous (2015)
by gibba999 on Friday July 23, 2021 @12:08PM
(#27932276)
Where did you get that definition of a vaccine?
Few vaccines, historically, worked perfectly.
Re:Chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous (2015)
by a_conservative on Friday July 23, 2021 @02:38PM
(#27934165)
From the article:
> It’s important to note childhood vaccines for polio, measles, mumps, rubella and smallpox aren’t leaky; they are considered “perfect” vaccines.
Re:Chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous (2015)
by Wowfunhappy on Friday July 23, 2021 @03:28PM
(#27934655)
Some vaccines (including those) are basically perfect, but they're a minority. It also doesn't logically follow that anything which isn't perfect isn't a vaccine.
And while the vaccines are "leaky", they appear to make people much less likely to spread the virus, not more.