Re:Google broke a conditional statement that verifies passwo...
by inetknght on Thursday July 22, 2021 @06:32PM
(#27925168)
I used to use them. Then I was burned by some Very Opinionated managers and coworkers who didn't like seeing new things. It wasn't a hill I was willing to die on; there's more important things to argue about in C++.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google broke a conditional statement that verifies passwo...
by josefx on Friday July 23, 2021 @03:51AM
(#27928276)
They have been around since the first standard and basically only exist as a hack around an ancient non ascii compatible encoding. So unless you got burned in 1995 nothing about them was new.
They also aren't very consistent between C derived languages. Mostly because C# inherited its versions from VisualBasic, where And is a bitwise operator instead of a short circuiting one.
Re:Google broke a conditional statement that verifies passwo...
by inetknght on Friday July 23, 2021 @10:17AM
(#27930903)
> * So unless you got burned in 1995 nothing about them was new.*
I didn't mean to imply that they were new features to the language. I meant to imply that they were new style of coding to the manager & coworkers.
Some other features that have burned me from managers & coworkers is `using` to change the visibility of parent class members & functions and CRTP.
Re:Google broke a conditional statement that verifies passwo...
by oceanswave on Friday July 23, 2021 @12:32AM
(#27927227)
Development is a massive cargo cult