Bezos donates $100M each to CNN contributor Van Jones and chef Jose Andres

Re:Bezos donates $100M each to CNN contributor Van Jones and... by ckozlowski on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @09:15PM (#27914220)

If you can deliver a warhead, chances are you can deliver a satellite.

Some of the space launchers today either started life as an ICBM turned dedicated launch vehicle (Proton) or are decommissioned ICBMs turned launch vehicles (Minotaur)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_(rocket_family) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minotaur_(rocket_family)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bezos donates $100M each to CNN contributor Van Jones and... by cwkoss on Wednesday July 21, 2021 @09:21PM (#27914262)

Makes sense that former-ICBMs that can reach orbital velocity have utility. (Are they still ICBMs if the goal isn't to reach another continent?)

I think the deltaV's needed to place a warhead on the surface are significantly less than those needed to put a satellite into low-earth orbit.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bezos donates $100M each to CNN contributor Van Jones and... by bigiain on Thursday July 22, 2021 @12:43AM (#27915439)

If you can lob your warheads into orbit with enough propellant left to accurately deorbit and aim them, you've then 1) got the capability of dropping them anywhere on the planet you choose, and 2) no longer have them sitting vulnerable in the silos and can sit back and choose your retargeting strategy without worrying about whether all your launch facilities will get nuked before you chose which cities to retaliate on...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bezos donates $100M each to CNN contributor Van Jones and... by m4rtink on Thursday July 22, 2021 @06:02AM (#27917180)

There has been somethink kinda like that, just not long term orbit:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_Orbital_Bombardme...

The other nuclear powers did not like it and it was scrapped. Not to mention that even if you might get the first shot this way, there will almost certainly be retaliatory strikes back on you.

[ Parent | on HN ]