News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anonymous & Lulz Security Statement to the FBI by AndyJPartridge on Thursday July 21, 2011 @12:46PM (#2790204)
Well said.

There is no difference between what Lulzsec and Anonymous do, compared with the FBI storming into a data centre without warrants and grabbing hardware.

None at all. In fact, the FBI did more damage.

Re:Anonymous & Lulz Security Statement to the FBI by brown9-2 on Thursday July 21, 2011 @02:36PM (#2790666)
with the FBI storming into a data centre without warrants and grabbing hardware.

Has it been proven that this is what happened?

Re:Anonymous & Lulz Security Statement to the FBI by AndyJPartridge on Thursday July 21, 2011 @10:12PM (#2792113)
Having looked back, it seems the Instapaper blog has been redacted. But I ask the questions:

Has it been proved the equipment was fairly taken?

I thought over the Atlantic pond it was "Innocent until proven guilty." It seems guilt was assumed and equipment taken.

No trial.

Re:Anonymous & Lulz Security Statement to the FBI by biturd on Thursday July 21, 2011 @09:47PM (#2792047)
It hasn't been unproven either. At least the antisec keeps up posted with full transparency as they go.
Re:Anonymous & Lulz Security Statement to the FBI by tshs33 on Thursday July 21, 2011 @03:12PM (#2790832)
FBI did not break any federal laws.
Re:Anonymous & Lulz Security Statement to the FBI by burgerbrain on Thursday July 21, 2011 @03:57PM (#2791035)
Well that only makes it even worse doesn't it?