The license for my software was written in a world where AI was not being used to replace me with my own code. Whatever license was chosen, was chosen to deal with the questions and issues known at the time.

It’s such a BS argument to say “your license didn’t anticipate the future, it’s your fault.” No, that’s not how law works.

Furthermore, law is not ethics. I said it’s ethically questionable because that’s what matters. Not if a court will find Microsoft guilty of some kind of overreach.

Anybody with even passing knowledge of law knows this, so please, stuff it somewhere.