By way of Alon Levy's blog (although original credit goes to a Twitter user), here's the TGV overlaid on the Midwest: https://twitter.com/Artifact_Scott/status/137770286794400973...

The major Midwestern cities are remarkably close in distance from Chicago as major French cities are from Paris, and in terms of population counts, the US has consistently larger cities.

Sure, but the problem is what do you do once you get there?

In France, the cities are dense with decent to great transit.

In the US, you have low, flat, sprawling cities with no real transit to speak of. You have to drive.

> "...what do you do once you get there?"

car rental, ridehailing, metro bus/train, taxi, friends/family pickup, etc., just as with air travel.

This is why looking at the current number of aviation passengers on these routes that's often the most valuable thing. It shows where people think the time savings justify hiring a car/taking taxis.

Clearly not having overheads of airport security will probably reduce the minimum distance required for this, but as a first pass it's good data source.

I have long said that we need to work on local transit before we work on HSR, but in truth the two do compliment each other. All cities of any size at all have at least a small amount of useful local transit. Expand the local system and make it useful would be a great investment and HSR will make it more useful.

Most local transit systems are run by people who drive though, and it shows in how bad the majority of the system is.

Same thing with planes except you start way outside the city.