News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Is GitHub Copilot a blessing, or a curse?. Parent comment

Re:Is GitHub Copilot a blessing, or a curse? by onion2k on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @05:19AM (#27891558)
The code doesn't exist in Copilot. The instructions for how to recreate the code does. On a very pedantic level those are not the same, but it probably is enough to argue that the product is 100% legal.

It is still quite rude to do that though.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is GitHub Copilot a blessing, or a curse? by dmurray on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @07:05AM (#27892284)
I don't think there's any water in that argument at a fundamental level. By that logic you could encode copyrighted information in any reversible format and it would be OK.

If I copy the code line by line with my eyes and keyboard, then the code briefly doesn't exist, but the instructions to recreate it do. Copying it is then a two-phase process: first I read the code, then I type it in. It is clear that I'm allowed to look at the code, so it's the action of typing it in that violates copyright. In the same way, distributing Copilot doesn't necessarily break copyright, but using it may.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is GitHub Copilot a blessing, or a curse? by xdennis on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @10:04AM (#27893856)
I don't think people should look at this based on current law, but what is right.

Copyright was established (much) after the printing press made copying so easy.

We now need protection against machine learning (learnright?) because the only way to not work for Microsoft for free now is to not release your source code... so not open source. Remember when people said that Microsoft changed its mind on open source?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is GitHub Copilot a blessing, or a curse? by IX-103 on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @09:29AM (#27893434)
There's an argument that the model is a derivative work. In that case the original copyright still applies.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is GitHub Copilot a blessing, or a curse? by dTal on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @06:23AM (#27891969)
So a .zip file of copyrighted code loses its license?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is GitHub Copilot a blessing, or a curse? by hvis on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @07:07AM (#27892294)
Did "instructions" recreate this?

https://twitter.com/stefankarpinski/status/14109710611816816...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is GitHub Copilot a blessing, or a curse? by UncleMeat on Tuesday July 20, 2021 @08:04AM (#27892717)
Yes. Models are much much smaller than compressed training sets, making it very clear that they are doing more than just compressing the entire training set.
[ Parent | on HN ]