News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nvidia Shield TV Owners Are Pissed About the Banner Ads i... by pdimitar on Monday July 19, 2021 @12:52PM (#27884756)
Yes, it is a bad thing. I paid fair and square for the device. I expect the vendor to have factored in all costs beforehand for the expected lifetime of the device. If it physically lasts 10 years then bill me all your expenses for those 10 years. Don't bill me for 3-4 years and then go "Oops, you still have that device, huh? Take those ads because we can't finance support for 6-7 more years out of all our billions. No really, we promise that we can't".

Additionally, I expect a corporation like NVIDIA or Google to have amortized the costs of supporting several ecosystems by the mere virtue of having engineers on them on a constant payroll -- those costs are not increasing, they remain the same for long periods of time -- plus to finance the support by other venues if need be. Brand loyalty and stuff?

This penny pinching by billionaire conglomerates leaves a sour taste in my mouth and it makes it all the more likely for me to invest in several specialized PCs, a home video / streaming player included. They'll never stop being shady, it seems, so we have to take things in our own hands, apparently.

Re:Nvidia Shield TV Owners Are Pissed About the Banner Ads i... by 8note on Monday July 19, 2021 @02:57PM (#27886102)
You own the device, sure, but you don't own the content that's playing on it, nor the servers delivering it.

These are profit oriented institutions. Once they've saturated the market, their only way to increase profits is to increase their per user profits.

The economy is designed to have your TV start showing ads.

Re:Nvidia Shield TV Owners Are Pissed About the Banner Ads i... by pdimitar on Monday July 19, 2021 @03:15PM (#27886258)
Well, I wish them luck. Practically every family knows one "IT person" and when we all collectively get fed up, come and watch how quickly do we drain the second-hand market of $200 laptops that we will repurpose as complete private home content consumption solutions.

I get how the business model of those services works btw -- but it's flawed from the beginning because it relies on keeping the users hostage.

The corps really underestimate the passive resistance they will meet. They think people will go to court and challenge their unbeatable lawyers there. No, nobody is going to do that. People will just work around those corporations (neighborhood private networks with NAS-es, old-school sharing of movies on DVDs or USB drives etc.; there are many ways).