I also agree with you that page turning experience is _the_ native control of a book and that it adds to the saccadic perception of moving forward with time.
B.t.w, I made this demo for exactly the reasons you mentioned, and I'm an older developer too!:
https://bubblin.io/book/a-florida-sketch-book-by-bradford-to...
> Should we? I spend my life staring
We probably should reduce felling trees for content that's read just once and then it goes outdated. I know a lot pulp-cultivation ambassadors say that it is a renewable resource, but in practicality pulp farming is not entirely renewable.
Cultivation takes place where an old forest once stood and was razed to the ground; and that loss of natural habitat is incalculable in costs–and to what end? A lifeless object on our bookshelf (which too is another dead tree) to show off with more outdated technical content?
Edit: To be more constructive:
Physical reference books are often accessed in a non-linear fashion, and often not alone. But let's forget that second part and focus on non-linear.
How do people take a physical reference book and provide themselves with good non-linear access? Bookmarks, tabs, dog eared pages, margin notes producing cross-references if absent from the text proper. And they may even sometimes pull out all the bookmarks and tabs and start over to create an entirely different (for their use-case) reference text (by "hiding" irrelevant information). That's what needs to be recreated in an e-reader, not page flipping, to be useful for reference texts.
As a point of frustration I recently experienced, I was running a TTRPG game and had a PDF with bookmarks to various classes (the ones players were using) and spells (ones I was using) and combat mechanics (what I was running). I later used the same PDF as a player, and found that I had too many bookmarks that made it hard for me to find exactly what I wanted. If I just added more bookmarks relevant to me as a player (playing a class not in the game I was running) it would add extra info to the DM version of the reference, and all the DM bookmarks were largely useless to me as a player.
What I needed was a way to get two views of the same underlying text, with different sections emphasized or elided for my differing situations. Provide that in an ereader without having to make a copy of the PDF and manually mangle it (which I've done too) but rather just an overlay on the existing text and it'll provide a much better experience and start competing, realistically competing, with dead tree reference and technical books.
Of course, the inability to (without a large display or large number of displays) view multiple texts side-by-side is another problem. I don't want 10 e-readers (a guess at the largest number of texts I needed to view in parallel). I have my iPad, laptop, and a Kindle that I already sometimes use simultaneously rather than printing material off or buying physical books. It's painful to use things that way and a much harder to solve problem without insisting that people buy more and more hardware. Which becomes obsolete quickly, probably faster than most reference and technical books become obsolete.
Overall, there’s a lot of work before a book like this goes native on the web. Better still, it the experience is standardized across vendors—which I have attempted as far as possible with the available tech. I mean scrolling is skeuomorphism off of the physical scrolls too, but that’s the point of start for a root problem here. Native books have never happened on the web, and that’s one main reason why people continue to buy the dead-tree; the lack of availability, bad experience and all.
> Physical reference books are often accessed in a non-linear fashion, and often not alone. But let's forget that second part and focus on non-linear.
The demo does implement random access via page numbers on the tail of the url. This affords both random access i.e non-linear reading and referential accessibility [1].
Maybe it’s an age thing, I used to have a lot more tolerance for this before my 30’s. Kindles are fine, but for leisure/fiction reading, or anything technical - it’s nice to be able to flip back/forth.