News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Maps updates 'dangerous' Ben Nevis route by cinntaile on Saturday July 17, 2021 @06:15PM (#27869253)
Trails are usually dotted lines and contour lines are always solid lines, was this not the case here?
Re:Google Maps updates 'dangerous' Ben Nevis route by javagram on Saturday July 17, 2021 @10:36PM (#27870411)
The article has a picture of the dotted line. It doesn’t appear to be a contour map at all.
Re:Google Maps updates 'dangerous' Ben Nevis route by midasuni on Sunday July 18, 2021 @04:47AM (#27871591)
The article doesn’t mention OSM at all
Re:Google Maps updates 'dangerous' Ben Nevis route by cinntaile on Saturday July 17, 2021 @09:19PM (#27870090)
Downvoted by people not used to reading topographic maps I guess ;) In all seriousness though, not sure why it's being downvoted. Perhaps we are just misunderstanding each other? That's how topographic maps work so I'm asking if that was not the case here. Surely even the online topographic maps come with a legend?
Re:Google Maps updates 'dangerous' Ben Nevis route by midasuni on Sunday July 18, 2021 @04:50AM (#27871605)
I’m used to OS maps in the U.K., and yes, contours are quite obvious, and map reading is a basic skill learnt about age 8.

However there’s no guarentee a give OSM render will show contours, footpaths, and different rights of way, in the same way as OS, or have a legend.