Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content”
by idiotsecant on Friday July 16, 2021 @11:16PM
(#27863329)
You're making the mistake of assuming morality from your current time, place, and culture is universal morality. You find slavery morally objectionable because the current cultural understanding is that slavery is morally objectionable. Future obedm might find it equally abhorrent that you, for example, routinely consumed the flesh of sentient animals or openly released carbon into the atmosphere for personal gain, or probably a million other things that will be completely unimaginable in polite society 500 years from now.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content”
by obedm on Saturday July 17, 2021 @05:52AM
(#27864692)
Haha you mirrored the argument I've made many times before. The eating meat part I feel is likely to be the thing that will change.
But that's an obvious one. What else will be seen as "barbaric" that we don't even think of challenging?
Working 8 hours a day? Having kids? Going outside or staying inside?
I remember the Greeks were not big on private property and instead took great pride in their public buildings. The polar opposite of our society now
Re:Google Drive bans distribution of “misleading content”
by throwaway210222 on Saturday July 17, 2021 @05:57AM
(#27864719)
> I remember the Greeks were not big on private property
Then you first have to make something other than private property the backbone of average peoples' pension funds.
I don't have ideas, you?