Re:SpaceX will soon fire up its Super Heavy booster for the ...
by rbanffy on Friday July 16, 2021 @06:55AM
(#27854933)
Making fuel on the Moon or on Mars is more or less the plan for any sustainable development of the solar system. Unless we get sci-fi grade engines, it’s just unfeasible to send fuel from Earth.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX will soon fire up its Super Heavy booster for the ...
by Robotbeat on Friday July 16, 2021 @09:35AM
(#27856076)
An acquaintance of mine who works in the industry (not at SpaceX) called Raptor a “scifi engine.”
For a lot of purposes, Starship should make it extremely cheap to send propellant from Earth. $10/kg in LEO. Cheaper than any lunar mining proposal I’ve seen.
That said, I hope we do make propellant off-Earth eventually.
Re:SpaceX will soon fire up its Super Heavy booster for the ...
by SEJeff on Friday July 16, 2021 @08:49PM
(#27862750)
Yeah if I remember correctly, I read that the solar panels required to ISRU make enough methane on Mars for a starship return flight would be two football fields worth and it would take them a few years to do it.
Re:SpaceX will soon fire up its Super Heavy booster for the ...
by Robotbeat on Saturday July 17, 2021 @10:37AM
(#27866082)
Area is just not a huge problem on Mars or in space in general. It’s not really a relevant figure of merit, unlike mass and pre-deployed volume
Re:SpaceX will soon fire up its Super Heavy booster for the ...
by bryanlarsen on Friday July 16, 2021 @08:32AM
(#27855566)
That's a chicken and egg problem. Making fuel off of Earth is going to require so much mass for infrastructure that it won't be feasible until we have fully reusable vehicles.