Re:World’s First 3D-Printed Steel Footbridge Unveiled by Que...
by Grakel on Thursday July 15, 2021 @07:23PM
(#27851260)
You said there's never any reason for art. That's not just abusive, it's wrong. Without a reason, it's not art. And the reason here is weak. It's "because we could." That's what makes this objectively bad.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:World’s First 3D-Printed Steel Footbridge Unveiled by Que...
by chrisseaton on Thursday July 15, 2021 @07:27PM
(#27851284)
You’re confusing reason as in technical requirement with reason as in why they chose to do something. They can choose to do something without it being a requirement.
And you’re changing your comments after they’ve been replied to - please don’t do that.
Re:World’s First 3D-Printed Steel Footbridge Unveiled by Que...
by Grakel on Thursday July 15, 2021 @07:39PM
(#27851391)
I'm not confused at all. You're constructing a very unusual meaning of "reason" in your first reply in order to...?
I was editing while you replied, I had not read your reply when I hit submit.