News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by ladon86 on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @07:16AM (#2785018)
Starting a private space organisation is ambitious. Starting a new operating system business is ambitious. Starting a CRM variant in which the customers manage their details for you is... Ambitious, I suppose, but the title of this submission is definitely hyperbolic.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by Eliezer on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @07:42AM (#2785065)
There's Tracey Davis ambitious, there's Draco Malfoy ambitious, and then there's Harry James Potter-Evans-Verres ambitious. The top end of the scale isn't "start an new OS business", it's things like molecular nanotechnology or self-improving artificial intelligence.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by patrickas on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @09:24AM (#2785358)
Speaking of Harry James Potter-Evans-Verres, come on! It's been almost two months! I need my HPMoR fix ;-)
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by leilavc on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @11:01AM (#2785822)
Am I the only person who feels a bit sorry/annoyed every time Eliezer gets harassed about updating HPMOR? It's his project, people, he'll update when he wants to.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by patrickas on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @01:15PM (#2786529)
It was supposed to be totally tongue in cheek with a wink and smiley to make it obvious. I suppose that is still harassment. I am sorry.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by T_S_ on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @12:20PM (#2786252)
Ambition metrics seem to be evolving. Whatever happened to Victor Frankenstein ambitious? Or Craig Venter ambitious? Has creating new life become less ambitious since the story of DNA was unravelled? Turns out there are arithmetic problems that are harder that these things.

I have seen enough CRM projects fail to consider them to be hard. For all we know consumer-side CRM might be really hard. After all, it involves human relations. Perhaps someone will come along one day and prove that creating the perfect CRM system involves solving a really hard arithmetic problem.

Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by geoffw8 on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @08:03AM (#2785110)
Errr, sure.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by irahul on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @08:09AM (#2785123)
> "start an new OS business"

Is that "an new" an error or some obscure rule I don't know about.

Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by StavrosK on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @08:16AM (#2785133)
He wrote the "new" afterwards.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by twidlit on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @07:22AM (#2785031)
Was thinking 'delirious' but hyperbolic can be used too.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by sunchild on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @08:45AM (#2785203)
Also, the idea of centralized privacy preferences has been around since at least the late 90's, and was abandoned in 2006. See: http://www.w3.org/P3P/
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by chaostheory on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @11:02AM (#2785828)
The (online implementation of the) idea for social networking started in the 90s too by a little company called 6degrees that Amazon eventually bought. It too was abandoned along with the idea of social networking until friendster came along.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by sunchild on Friday July 29, 2011 @07:00PM (#2824182)
Yes. I was a member of 6degrees back in the day.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by tel on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @08:44AM (#2785200)
Of course, the very first sentence qualifies that statement with "... out of South Africa". I'm not an expert on South African companies, but I imagine that it's far less unlikely to be true with that qualification.
Re:TrustFabric - Most ambitious startup ever by Animus7 on Wednesday July 20, 2011 @07:25AM (#2785039)
It feels ambitious in a different sense than for which I'd normally reserve the word. Ambitious in the sense that it will be a long journey. But it feels like the success or failure of this will be tied much more to whether the market is ready for it (and whether for security reasons it's feasible) than how much sweat goes into it.