News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pharo 9 by thinker5555 on Thursday July 15, 2021 @07:56AM (#27843712)
Not a lesson I was expecting to learn today, but here we are. I always thought it was the "reign" version because monarchs can "reign freely".
Re:Pharo 9 by regularfry on Thursday July 15, 2021 @08:25AM (#27843937)
Yeah, the more usual wording is "given a free rein", which makes it a little clearer. A monarch isn't given their reign, it's theirs by right (well, with a bit of hand-waving. Or possibly sword-waving, but not since Henry VII).
Re:Pharo 9 by rjsw on Thursday July 15, 2021 @09:53AM (#27844711)
The last English king to try to reign with no constraints was Charles I, it didn't end well for him.
Re:Pharo 9 by Zuider on Saturday July 17, 2021 @04:42PM (#27868690)
James II entertained the same delusions as Charles of being absolute monarch. He had a kinder fate, being carefully allowed to escape twice on his journey to France.
Re:Pharo 9 by pasc1878 on Thursday July 15, 2021 @08:33AM (#27843988)
For English kings you forgot William III
Re:Pharo 9 by dash2 on Thursday July 15, 2021 @09:45AM (#27844605)
Actually I think the last king to go into battle at all was George II.
Re:Pharo 9 by Zuider on Saturday July 17, 2021 @04:35PM (#27868629)
Giving 'free rein' comes from the pragmatic practice of allowing a horse to chose the best path over difficult terrain on the grounds that the animal would know better than the rider.