Re:Germany fines YouTube for removing video of anti-lockdown...
by throwawayswede on Wednesday July 14, 2021 @04:33PM
(#27838078)
NYT Opinion page (essence bullshit basically) is.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Germany fines YouTube for removing video of anti-lockdown...
by scotty79 on Wednesday July 14, 2021 @06:32PM
(#27839285)
If NYT does the selection and curation then it's not. Same way opinion piece inspired by what author heard from other people is not a platform for those people.
Re:Germany fines YouTube for removing video of anti-lockdown...
by imwillofficial on Wednesday July 14, 2021 @05:23PM
(#27838612)
NYT Opinion page is not a “public square”
In America at least, there are different sets of rules for different types of business.
A curated opinion piece, carefully chosen by experienced editors, is vastly different from a public swimming pool. For the first, that filter, that exclusivity, that editorializing is part of the draw. It’s good because it’s a filter, not a platform. The public pool should not be a filter, and yes, sometimes there are weird things that float in there, and it takes effort to clean up, but that’s the cost of being open to the public.