News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by flavius29663 on Tuesday July 13, 2021 @11:07PM (#27829178)
You're oversimplifying it. First of all, the ocean is a sink for CO2, it absorbs it and mix it down in the depths, not release it back.

Plants don't sequester the carbon, like you said. But on the other hand, the extra CO2 is causing a bigger plant mass growth. So called greening of the deserts (but not just deserts). So basically the living biosphere is growing and absorbing CO2 as it does, because it can.

The plants evolved when there was more CO2 around, 200-300 is very close to starvation, they thrive in 1000+ environments.

Total Earth biomass is 550 gigatons, much larger than 36 which is what we emit every year. But obviously it cannot keep up...since the year 1750 we emitted 1700 gigatons, so more than 3 times the weight of the biosphere. That being said, I can see how the biosphere can grow by 2% with all the extra CO2 and go from 550 to 560, 570 and so on.

Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by Mizza on Wednesday July 14, 2021 @12:42PM (#27835094)
The limiting factor for plant growth isn't carbon, it's nitrogen.
Re:$100M xPrize for Carbon Removal by flavius29663 on Wednesday July 14, 2021 @01:33PM (#27835750)
While that is true for a lot of circumstances, in others the addition of CO2 helps the plants survive droughts and other conditions easier.

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fer...

https://theconversation.com/yes-more-carbon-dioxide-in-the-a...

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gcb.14950